[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 19:19, Jeff Lowery wrote:
> > We have requests to support things such as the Japanese
> > calendar or complex numbers in DSDL and I think we'd better
> > find a way to let people define what they need rather than
> > attempting to be "universal" and define all the possible datatypes.
>
> Doesn't this just change the problem from defining all possible types to one
> of defining all possible facets? Is that really any easier?
It's raising the bar on the expressiveness of the language used to
define the facets, but I think that, yes, it should be easier.
Eric
--
Don't you think all these XML schema languages should work together?
http://dsdl.org
Upcoming schema tutorial:
- Philadelphia (7/12/2003) http://makeashorterlink.com/?V28612FC5
Tutoriel XSLT:
- Paris (25/11/2003) http://makeashorterlink.com/?L2C623FC5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
