RE: [xml-dev] fundamental facets - inquiry from the XML SchemaWo rking Group

[Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@creo.com>]

> From: Eric van der Vlist [mailto:vdv@dyomedea.com] 

> It's raising the bar on the expressiveness of the language 
> used to define the facets, but I think that, yes, it should 
> be easier. 

Hmmm. I wonder about incompatible formal systems (i.e., ones that are based
on different axioms): can we define enough facets for all? Seems intractable
to me, but maybe I'm missing the drift here.