Lists Home |
Date Index |
> From: Eric van der Vlist [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> It's raising the bar on the expressiveness of the language
> used to define the facets, but I think that, yes, it should
> be easier.
Hmmm. I wonder about incompatible formal systems (i.e., ones that are based
on different axioms): can we define enough facets for all? Seems intractable
to me, but maybe I'm missing the drift here.