[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
"Bryce K. Nielsen" <bryce@sysonyx.com> writes:
> Otherwise, to avoid this in general schema-design, only have one
> global element, make the rest complexType or simpleType nodes. One
> should also note that for a schema to be valid, you have to have a
> least one global element (as opposed to a bunch of type nodes).
Not so. A schema document, or even a schema, with nothing but type
definitions is perfectly valid, and indeed useful -- an xsi:type somewhere
in an instance document, e.g. the document element, would get
everything started just fine.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
|
