[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> writes:
> Bill de h?ra scripsit:
>
> > I'd love to know what SOAP-oriented folks think about it.
>
> I should think they'd think it's totally useless, just like the original
> proposal for infoset-level names. Machine-generated XML would have no
> use for UTF-8+names.
How ironic that your mailer generated "Bill de h?ra scripsit:"
then. Is there a reason it insists on charset=us-ascii?
> > It also potentially hurts interop - there are costs and benefits to
> > be weighed up.
>
> Flexibility and interoperability are always opposed. If we all had
> just one kind of computer and just one set of software, we'd all
> have perfect interoperability. (Hmm.)
"I see a market for about 1 computer installation..."
--
Elections only count as free and trials as fair if you can lose money
betting on the outcome.
|
