[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
In article <p06002008bbbc32627620@[192.168.254.4]> you write:
>It might affect people who are wrapping to a specific line length,
>especially if they have a longish encoding name.
If you can show a single real document that this applies to, I'll take
it more seriously.
>However, I don't see the benefit of doing it in 1.1 since parsers
>already have the code to handle line broken XML declarations.
The problem is that you don't know which characters are line breaks
until you've read the version number.
>Making
>an additional distinction between 1.0 and 1.1 will just make parsers
>a little harder to write since they'll need to special case this
>depending on version.
The change was based on implementor feedback, in particular a comment
from me, though I only suggested outlawing the new line end characters.
>In either case, I assume you're planning to go back to last call
>then? I don't see anything about this in the candidate recommendation.
The CR period is for implementation feedback. Since it affects no
existing (i.e. 1.0) documents, I can't see any need to go back to
last call.
-- Richard
|
