OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

 


 

   Re: [xml-dev] InfoPath Digital Signature controversy?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

<Quote>
For accessibility, the presentational form has to vary to meet end user
need, yet here they mandate binding them.
</Quote>

Are these two requirements (varying the presentational form to meet user
needs and binding presentation with content and context) orthogonal?

Kind Regards,
Joe Chiusano
Booz | Allen | Hamilton

Dave Pawson wrote:
> 
> At 14:30 29/10/2003, you wrote:
> >Hi Dave,
> >
> >We certainly can't assume that all electronic forms are accessible. Of
> >course, given that this was a federal-sponsored initiative accessibility
> >was one of the main topics. There was an Accessibility subteam
> >(described in more detail in the URL I provided in my previous e-mail),
> >and one of the recommendations at the end states that it should be
> >ensured that "e-forms support Section 508 accessibility requirements.
> >This is a critical requirement, mandated by law.".
> 
> So combining that with
> 
> > > >addition, any signature must be applied to this combination of
> > > >presentation, content, and context, and the authentication process must
> > > >ensure integrity.
> 
> That's what has me confused.
>   For accessibility, the presentational form has to vary to meet end user need,
> yet here they mandate binding them.
> 
> Must be gov logic:-)
> 
> regards DaveP
begin:vcard 
n:Chiusano;Joseph
tel;work:(703) 902-6923
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.bah.com
org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team
adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012;
version:2.1
email;internet:chiusano_joseph@bah.com
title:Senior Consultant
fn:Joseph M. Chiusano
end:vcard




 

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS