[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Well, we have implemented "SAX-like" which I guess is what you experts are
now calling "SAD". Is that good enough for "proof of concept"?
Regards,
Ed Day
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alaric B Snell" <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
To: "Bill de hÓra" <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
Cc: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 7:36 PM
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Reusing, Refactoring, Reinventing??? (was Re:
[xml-dev] SAX for Binary Encodings (SAD-SAX)
> Bill de hÓra wrote:
> > Plus if it's really that simple, why can't some of
> > the ASN.1 folks build a SAD engine as proof of concept?
>
> They may well, they're just focussing on standard SAX to start with,
> since there's already an installed base of ContentHandler-implementing
> classes to talk to :-)
>
> > Bill de hÓra
>
> ABS
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
|
