[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
that is satisfactory :) however, thinking of it differently, I cannot be
sending any such PI as part of my latex file.. right??
Anyways, i guess it sounds we can ignore such security lapses, but I will
not totally dismiss the possibility of a security loop hole right now.. At
least, I need to know whether my XML s/w protects me against such drastic
things, when I am using some random XML file from some random place...???
anyways, later..
best, murali.
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Stephan Wiesner wrote:
> Murali Mani wrote:
>
> > Is it not possible to specify some bad processing instructions? I think an
> > example of a bad processing instruction (that I am thinking of) and why it
> > is not a problem will help..??
> >
> Has Java a security hole because I can write:
> File f = new File("c:\autoexec.bat");
> f.delete();
>
> Maybe I should contact Sun about it and get a reward for finding it ;-)
>
> Stephan
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
|
