xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...

RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@creo.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 10:37:34 -0800

I'm sure this has been asked before, but I missed it:

What can be achieved by binary XML that can't be similarly achieved using well-known text compression algorithms?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
  - From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
- RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
  - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@wyman.us>
- Why not just zip the XML? [was the MS FUD thread]
  - From: Michael Champion <mc@xegesis.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Updating document with SAX
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Updating document with SAX
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
Next by thread: Why not just zip the XML? [was the MS FUD thread]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS