[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Alaric B Snell scripsit:
> Yep, if we enclosed this entire email in <e> and </e> to make it into
> XML, then the PER equivelant would be something like a 2-byte
> variable-length integer encoding the message length followed by the text
> of the message - a meager saving of 5 bytes out of a couple of K.
Of course, a *real* PER encoding of your email would be to encode the
author as 01, and then leave the content to be reconstructed by the
receiver. :-)
--
One Word to write them all, John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
One Access to find them, http://www.reutershealth.com
One Excel to count them all, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
And thus to Windows bind them. --Mike Champion
|
