xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...

Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:36:57 +0000
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <20031121121743.GD2712@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <001401c3afc4$c3c479b0$650aa8c0@BOBDEV> <3FBDF2C4.1090900@alaric-snell.com> <20031121121743.GD2712@mercury.ccil.org>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030704 Debian/1.4-1

John Cowan wrote:

> 
> Of course, a *real* PER encoding of your email would be to encode the
> author as 01, and then leave the content to be reconstructed by the
> receiver.  :-)
> 

Am I that predictable? :-)

ABS

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
  - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@wyman.us>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
  - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@wyman.us>
- Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
  - From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread