xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...

Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 00:26:02 -0500
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <3FC15800.4060405@allette.com.au>
References: <004201c3af99$e9944010$650aa8c0@BOBDEV> <3FBDAFDA.3010905@allette.com.au> <3FBDF386.9090307@alaric-snell.com> <20031121.121152.50253888.Tony.Graham@Sun.COM> <3FBE14D8.7040405@alaric-snell.com> <p06010201bbe4835029d4@[192.168.254.4]> <3FC15800.4060405@allette.com.au>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3

Rick Jelliffe wrote:

> ...nor "kangaroo" in books on US 
> quasi-extra-terratorial
> military legal practise (though maybe it should).
> 

Hmm, "kangaroo court" may come to mind ...


Cheers,

Tom P

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
  - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@wyman.us>
- Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
  - From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
- Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
  - From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
  - From: Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@Sun.COM>
- Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
  - From: Alaric B Snell <alaric@alaric-snell.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
  - From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
  - From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>

Prev by Date: [offtopic] Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
Next by Date: Off topic - Korean language
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft FUD on binary XML...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread