[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
>
>>At 4:10 PM +0000 11/23/03, Michael Kay wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Others may disagree, but my perception is that Xerces is bigger, slower,
>>>has more features and fewer bugs.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>I'll second that. By my count, Xerces-J currently has one bug in
>>basic XML parsing. (It doesn't report default attribute values from
>>the internal DTD subset in invalid documents.) Its nearest
>>competitor, the latest Oracle beta, has about ten such bugs. All
>>other parsers I've tested are worse.
>>
>>
>>
> I think the Xerces parser is excellent. Unfortunately the DOM
> implementation is tainted by their use of "deferred node expansion" by
> default. This works reasonably well for larger documents but adds a
> hefty overhead to building the DOM for small documents. It also has the
> unfortunate side effect of making read-only DOM access unsafe for
> multithreaded use (since reading the nodes will actually alter their
> internal representation). I haven't checked if Sun left this enabled for
> the JAXP bundling of Xerces, but assume they did.
I want to modify the source files corresponding to the package (Xerces
or Crimson) to include additional functionality. I am using Xerces jar
files
to execute my programs. But unfortunately when i am debugging my program,
control goes to the crimson package. So which files i need to change. I am
using J2SDK1.4.1.
>
> - Dennis
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
>
E.Amarnadh Sai,
email: amarnadh@cse.iitb.ac.in, amarnadh@iitb.ac.in
|
