xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] Abstract Equivalence (was Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)

RE: [xml-dev] Abstract Equivalence (was Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "'XML DEV'" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Abstract Equivalence (was Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 16:19:00 -0500
In-reply-to: <004001c3b2b9$fafaf330$650aa8c0@BOBDEV>

bob@wyman.us (Bob Wyman) writes:
>Yes, I'm a "platonist" as far as this discussion goes

It's good to know this permathread goes back 2500 years or more.

Personally, I keep hoping a philosopher-king will arrive and outlaw
Platonism in this field utterly.

No signs of that at the W3C, of course.

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Abstract Equivalence (was Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
  - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@wyman.us>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Relating to XML
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Relating to XML
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Abstract Equivalence (was Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Abstract Equivalence (was Microsoft FUD on binary XML...)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread