[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
David Tolpin wrote:
> What does 'a technology is complex' mean?
Quite often, it means no abstractions (i.e. tools)that effectively make
the technology easier to use are available. However, sometimes the crown
of complexity is based on a comparison to another technology with
similar goals ;-)
> And error corrections
> don't add clarity (usually), they sacrifice clarity for the sake of unambiguity.
True, but there's no true interoperability without unambiguity.
Happy holidays,
Manos
|