[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
>
> What does 'a technology is complex' mean?
>
> For me, a good metric is the relative size of errata. For xml
> schema datatypes, the errata is one quarter of the size of
> the document. And error corrections don't add clarity
> (usually), they sacrifice clarity for the sake of unambiguity.
>
I don't think complexity and bugginess are necessarily related. Schema
Part 1 is far more complex than part 2, but far less buggy.
Michael Kay
|