[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> >
> > What does 'a technology is complex' mean?
> >
> > For me, a good metric is the relative size of errata. For xml
> > schema datatypes, the errata is one quarter of the size of
> > the document. And error corrections don't add clarity
> > (usually), they sacrifice clarity for the sake of unambiguity.
> >
>
> I don't think complexity and bugginess are necessarily related. Schema
> Part 1 is far more complex than part 2, but far less buggy.
What I am trying to talk about is 'unorthogonality'. Bugginess is a consequence
of unorthogonality.
http://www.faqs.org/docs/artu/ch04s02.html
David Tolpin
|
