[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Does anyone here know the reasoning behind this? In specific, why does
xml:base allow URI references (i.e. with fragment identifiers) rather
than simply using URIs (URIrefs sans fragment identifiers)?
The reason that I ask is that there are some instances in the RDF and
OWL PR where xml:base's ending in '#' are used so that the base URI
matches the XML namespace ... I can see the convenience of this but the
practice strikes me as a bit weird. Perhaps I am missing something.
Jonathan
|