[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
rsalz@datapower.com (Rich Salz) writes:
>> It seems like the people who've tried hardest to push the world to an
>> infoset-centric view of XML are now finding that even that isn't
>> consistent enough for their needs.
>
>Not that I disagree, but on what do you base this?
Years of reading mailing lists, and TimBL's message at:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Jan/0013.html
The list of "ways serializations vary" is especially interesting, as
none of them seem founded on the SGML core - they're all about features
added later.
I (probably foolishly) wrote www-tag a reply to Tim's message that
builds on this.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Jan/0017.html
Floor wax. Dessert topping. Whatever.
--
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
