xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Postel's law, exceptions

Re: [xml-dev] Postel's law, exceptions

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Michael Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Postel's law, exceptions
From: Bob Foster <bob@objfac.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:02:36 -0600
Cc: "'xml-dev@lists.xml.org '" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
In-reply-to: <84A17744-4621-11D8-8ADE-000A95CCC59E@xegesis.org>
References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F139@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com> <84A17744-4621-11D8-8ADE-000A95CCC59E@xegesis.org>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007

Michael Champion wrote:
> ...[awaiting 
> shrieks from the people who shot down XML 1.1]...

I see a November 2003 Candidate Recommendation for XML 1.1. I haven't 
checked it for bullet holes, but it seems healthy enough to an outsider. 
What do you mean?

Bob Foster
http://xmlbuddy.com/

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Postel's law, exceptions
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Postel's law, exceptions
  - From: Michael Champion <mc@xegesis.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Postel's law, exceptions
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Postel's "Law": A question for liberal parsers
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Postel's law, exceptions
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Postel's law, exceptions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread