[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: "Michael Champion" <mc@xegesis.org>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Postel's law, exceptions
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:57:15 -0800
- Thread-index: AcPaLi8BbS4txTaMQJyby6TQbW0PRAAE1urw
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] Postel's law, exceptions
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Michael Champion [mailto:mc@xegesis.org]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 3:38 PM
>To: 'xml-dev@lists.xml.org '
>Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Postel's law, exceptions
>
>That poses a bit of a problem for the XML community -- is the
>rational response to "fix" the bits of XML that people stumble
>over [awaiting shrieks from the people who shot down XML 1.1],
I work on RSS in my free time. The most common well-formedness errors
are documents with incorrect encodings or documents that use HTML
entities without a reference to the HTML DTD. How exactly do you propose
XML 1.x fix these problems?
--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
Entropy isn't what it used to be.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
|
