xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Postel's law, exceptions

Re: [xml-dev] Postel's law, exceptions

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: 'xml-dev@lists.xml.org ' <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Postel's law, exceptions
From: Michael Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:24:35 -0500
In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D10190E1B6@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D10190E1B6@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>


On Jan 13, 2004, at 8:57 PM, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
>
> I work on RSS in my free time. The most common well-formedness errors
> are documents with incorrect encodings or documents that use HTML
> entities without a reference to the HTML DTD. How exactly do you 
> propose
> XML 1.x fix these problems?
>
I don't; I didn't take the time / thought to figure out that Sam Ruby's 
'scientific experiment' document contained an encoding error rather 
than a  character that was illegal in XML 1.0.  Sorry for blathering 
without thinking.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Postel's law, exceptions
  - From: Michael Champion <mc@xegesis.org>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Postel's law, exceptions
  - From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Postel's law, exceptions
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Postel's law, exceptions
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Postel's law, exceptions
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Postel's law, exceptions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread