[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: [XOM-interest] Re: Unicode forms for internal storage
- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 08:09:07 -0500
- Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- In-reply-to: <p06010202bc3414d0f2c8@[192.168.254.4]>
- References: <20030420212424.77D5824AEB6@mail.ibiblio.org> <p0601020bbc330bbad09a@[192.168.254.4]> <1074680678.400e53666dcf0@82.195.128.192> <p06010202bc3414d0f2c8@[192.168.254.4]>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:
> No, I don't plan to support XML 1.1, certainly not in XOM 1.0 and
> beyond that not unless someone asks for it and demonstrates a real
> need. This is discussed in the XOM FAQ at
> http://www.cafeconleche.org/XOM/faq.xhtml#d0e183
Your more moderate remarks in "Fifty Ways To Lose Your XML Virginity"
have my full support, but I really do resent the word "abomination".
Perhaps I shall have to issue a rogue patch for XOM....
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! `Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
|
