Lists Home |
Date Index |
Ah, POND. Dim recollections; although I think I missed this post, I seem to
recall you bringing up the acronym on a few occasions.
Looks like you're using the outer-most namespace as the "true" namespace,
with the inner namespaces used for type identification. That's a fourth
approach to signifying standard types that I could add to the three I posted
When good ideas go bad, bad ideas sound better.
"No more Schema,
No more tools,
No more dirty parsing rules."
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 12:59 PM
> To: Jeff.Lowery@creo.com
> Subject: WARNING: Namespace thread virus (new variant?)
> I mentioned something like this long ago at: