[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
At 9:27 AM -0500 2/22/04, David Megginson wrote:
>* Topic 2004-0002: XML 1.1 support
>
>- add a read-only feature to check for XML 1.1 support (John Cowan,
> 2004-02-18)
>
I suggest this should be read-write for parsers that support XML 1.1.
I have a need to sometimes require documents to be 1.0, and right now
setting that up with a parser that supports 1.0 is a royal PITA.
>- add a read-only property (double) to return the version number of
> the document being parsed (John Cowan, 2004-02-18)
I suggest that this property be a String rather than double. Several reasons:
1. Long term, it may not always be parseable as a double (1.1.1 anyone?)
2. Double equality comparisons are very tricky. String comparisons
are much simpler.
3. It's not hard to convert a String to a double if you need that for
some reason.
4. It's not really possible to make the value of the property a
primitive double in Java. It would have to be a Double. Better to
just make it a String, which is a little easier to deal with in code.
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elharo@metalab.unc.edu
Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA
|
