[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 18:11, Robert Koberg wrote:
> Eric van der Vlist wrote:
>
> > Maybe they are carefully hidden in the member's section, but I have
> > never seen a cost analysis for a W3C (or any other competing standard
> > organisation) decision made in the name of the mythic 80/20 rule...
>
> the easier it is to make money from some tool, the faster the adoption
> of that tool
>
> do you disagree?
I don't know (I have never been good at making money), but I don't see
how that relates to the mis-usage of the 80/20 to accept or reject
technical feature requests without any cost and market analysis.
But never mind...
Eric
--
Carnet web :
http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog?t=category&a=Fran%C3%A7ais
Upcoming XML schema languages tutorial:
- Santa Clara -half day- (15/03/2004) http://masl.to/?J24916E96
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(ISO) RELAX NG ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
