[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
This suggests to me that XML DSig is basically a questionable idea. Why
the obsession with text? It seems like doing this at the Infoset level
would be much simpler (and much more efficient).
- Dennis
Derek Denny-Brown wrote:
>Worse... try and do it efficiently, especially in documents which
>include DTDs. The cost of normalizing attribute values, as well as
>sorting attributes comes up every time I talk with people investigating
>use Xml DSig. I can't wait for people to ask for WXS normalization.
>
>-derek
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@textuality.com]
>>Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 10:31 PM
>>To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org DEV
>>Subject: [xml-dev] Rich & Elliotte were right, I was wrong
>>
>>Canonicalizing XML is hard! -Tim
>>
>>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
>initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
>The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
>manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
>
>
>
|
