[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Jim Rankin wrote:
> Would anyone here like to argue that the list found in
>
> http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/04/01/WS-Mumble
>
> is coherent, or sensible, or viable, or generally that the parrot is
> not dead?
>
> I wish that we could just look at the "Updated:" date on your post and
> categorize this with some of the other things posted yesterday...
I wish I'd read those other things, but I did go and look at Tim's blog.
Ouch. It's bizarre seeing all of those WS-* specs out there, when we
haven't even had a chance to gain much real experience using SOAP at the
basic RPC level. The WS-Parrot is not dead per se: it was never given a
chance to hatch.
All the best,
David
|
