xml-dev - WS-Emperor naked?

WS-Emperor naked?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org DEV <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: WS-Emperor naked?
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 12:04:00 -0800

Would anyone here like to argue that the list found in

  http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/04/01/WS-Mumble

is coherent, or sensible, or viable, or generally that the parrot is 
not dead?

  -Tim

smime.p7s

Follow-Ups:
- Re: WS-Emperor naked?
  - From: "Andrzej Jan Taramina" <andrzej@chaeron.com>
- RE: [xml-dev] WS-Emperor naked?
  - From: "Paul Sumner Downey" <Paul.Downey@whatfettle.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] WS-Emperor naked?
  - From: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
- RE: [xml-dev] WS-Emperor naked?
  - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@wyman.us>
- RE: [xml-dev] WS-Emperor naked?
  - From: "Bob Wyman" <bob@wyman.us>
- Re: [xml-dev] WS-Emperor naked?
  - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] WS-Emperor naked?
  - From: Michael Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] WS-Emperor naked?
  - From: Jim Rankin <jimbokun_lists@mac.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] WS-Emperor naked?
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] WS-Emperor naked?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread