[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
FWIW, a few comments on/corrections to the CBDI list at [1]:
- Under the "Standard or Admin Body", there are many occurrences of "Not
yet submitted". I believe this makes the (incorrect) assumption that the
intention is to submit these specifications to ooen standards
consortiums, when that is not always the case. I would say "Not
submitted" or "Vendor specification". [This one is an opinion, not a
correction]
- WS-CAF is an OASIS TC [2], yet it's listed as "Not yet submitted"
- WS-Provisioning is really the OASIS Provisioning Services Technical
Committee (PSTC), which is not restricted to Web Services
- WS-RF is now an OASIS TC [3]
- The Liberty Alliance [4] should probably be listed, for Identity
Management
- Although not specific to Web Services, OASIS XACML [5] should also be
listed, as there is a draft Web Services Profile [6]
- I would also add WS-Discovery [7]
- and WS-MetadataExchange [8]
Kind Regards,
Joe Chiusano
Booz | Allen | Hamilton
Strategy and Technology Consultants to the World
[1] http://roadmap.cbdiforum.com/reports/protocols/summary.php
[2] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=ws-caf
[3] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=wsrf
[4] www.projectliberty.org
[5] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=xacml
[6]
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/3661/draft-xacml-wspl-04.pdf
[7]
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnglobspec/html/ws-discovery.asp
[8] http://xml.coverpages.org/WS-MetadataExchange.pdf
Tim Bray wrote:
>
> Would anyone here like to argue that the list found in
>
> http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/04/01/WS-Mumble
>
> is coherent, or sensible, or viable, or generally that the parrot is
> not dead?
>
> -Tim
--
Kind Regards,
Joseph Chiusano
Associate
Booz | Allen | Hamilton
|
