[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
This sentence was of course condensing the spec like crazy. Look for the
rules for <xsl:for-each> and <xsl:apply-templates> when there is no
<xsl:sort> element.
Michael Kay
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Tolpin [mailto:dvd@davidashen.net]
> Sent: 04 April 2004 16:07
> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Re: xpath: which is right?
>
> > > itym XML::XPath is wrong then as it is the one which uses
> document
> > > order, as opposed to libxslt which uses reversed document order.
> >
> > In both XPath 1.0 and 2.0, nodes on a reverse axis are
> *numbered* in reverse
> > document order, but *delivered* in forwards document order.
> >
> > Michael Kay
> >
> > (slight caveat for 1.0: XPath doesn't define in what order
> the nodes are
> > delivered, but XSLT does).
>
> I've searched XSLT 1.0 specification for string 'deliver' and didn't
> find any matches. How does the specification define the order of
> delivery?
>
> David
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
>
>
|
