xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?

Re: [xml-dev] Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: rjm@zenucom.com
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
From: Jim Rankin <jimbokun_lists@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 15:32:15 -0400
Cc: "xml-dev@lists.xml.org DEV" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
In-reply-to: <1081201995.2522.60.camel@znote.zenucom.com>
References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9F58C@hq1.pcmail.ingr.com> <1081201995.2522.60.camel@znote.zenucom.com>

On Apr 5, 2004, at 5:53 PM, Rick Marshall wrote:

simple things are good. they can
be understood, implemented, and used in the lifetime of a human being.
complex things are of no use because they can't.

I just added this to my signatures list.

-jimbo

Excelsior! XML Marshaller for Cocoa
http://www.homepage.mac.com/jimbokun/Excelsior.html

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- RE: [xml-dev] Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
  - From: Rick Marshall <rjm@zenucom.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] xpath in javascript
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Competing Specifications - A Good or Bad Thing?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS