xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Eclipse: the new Emacs? (and the XML story)

Re: [xml-dev] Eclipse: the new Emacs? (and the XML story)

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Eclipse: the new Emacs? (and the XML story)
From: ari@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (K. Ari Krupnikov)
Date: 06 Apr 2004 16:49:12 -0700
In-reply-to: <4072A4C0.8010504@attglobal.net>
References: <40716EFF.4050405@attglobal.net> <407182A3.5090502@objfac.com><40729C26.1080806@chipware.com> <4072A4C0.8010504@attglobal.net>
Sender: ari@fdra.lib.aero
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3

David Megginson <dmeggin@attglobal.net> writes:

> Java objects have an awful lot of built-in
> memory overhead just for the java.lang.Object base class

Do you know how much memory you actually use for a "new Object()"?

Ari.

-- 
Elections only count as free and trials as fair if you can lose money
betting on the outcome.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Eclipse: the new Emacs? (and the XML story)
  - From: Bob Foster <bob@objfac.com>

References:
- Eclipse: the new Emacs? (and the XML story)
  - From: David Megginson <dmeggin@attglobal.net>
- Re: [xml-dev] Eclipse: the new Emacs? (and the XML story)
  - From: Bob Foster <bob@objfac.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Eclipse: the new Emacs? (and the XML story)
  - From: Mark Schmeets <mark@chipware.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Eclipse: the new Emacs? (and the XML story)
  - From: David Megginson <dmeggin@attglobal.net>

Prev by Date: Can anyURI be empty?
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] XML question - reference points
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Eclipse: the new Emacs? (and the XML story)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Eclipse: the new Emacs? (and the XML story)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS