[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Bryce K. Nielsen wrote:
> Eh, my opinion has always been XML is Text, so why overcomplicate the
> editor? The editor should be a simple but powerful text editor with some
> very minor XML conveniences thrown in. Which was what prompted me to
create
> the xmlHack editor. It's modelled somewhat after Allaire's Homesite
> application (now Macromedia's). An HTML editor with no visual bells and
> whistles, just simple text. I can open a 75mb document in xmlHack in
about 5
> seconds. Once open, the whole thing is highlighted, ready to go, no
delays
> trying to create objects. Just your text ready for your editing.
Can't argue with that. If you do less, you can do it in less memory.
Bob Foster
http://xmlbuddy.com/
> A lot of people for and against XML don't take the time to consider the
> proper usage of XML in large documents. Those I've spoken with who
hate XML,
> or at least feel it's used in the wrong places, are usually because
they are
> dealing with large documents and whatever application is processing them
> crumbles (such as Microsoft's Biztalk, can't handle a document larger
than
> 20mb). And on the flipside, those for XML usually state things like
XML is
> great for small documents, instant internet communications, etc. Both
sides
> fail to realize that if coded properly, size matters not.
>
> Bryce K. Nielsen
> SysOnyx, Inc. (www.sysonyx.com)
> Makers of xmlHack, the Simple XML Editor
> http://www.sysonyx.com/products/xmlhack
|
