[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@lig.net>,"Liam Quin" <liam@w3.org>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] The "what is XML" permathread revisited -- was Re: [xml-dev] XML Binary Characterization WG public list availabl e
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 11:04:14 -0700
- Cc: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@datapower.com>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Thread-index: AcQhgIVvuwJhsPAfQuWHa0tOYSh7CwAARDaQ
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] The "what is XML" permathread revisited -- was Re: [xml-dev] XML Binary Characterization WG public list availabl e
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen D. Williams [mailto:sdw@lig.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 10:44 AM
> To: Liam Quin
> Cc: Rich Salz; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] The "what is XML" permathread
> revisited -- was Re: [xml-dev] XML Binary Characterization WG
> public list availabl e
>
> I would also note that every element can have it's own
> encoding. This meshes perfectly with my plan to support
> whatever encoding is used for text in a particular element,
> individually for each element.
I've never heard that XML allows every element to have its own encoding,
in fact I'm pretty sure it explicitly disallows it.
--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
Those who fail in life often follow the path of least persistence.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
|
