OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   RE: [xml-dev] XUL Compact Syntax Study Now Online - Is XML too hard for

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

It is like guitar tablature: easy to compose in and read for 
a guitar player, and therefore, it is useful.  On the other 
hand, one never learns to read music or understand traditional 
theory, so advanced guitar students are weaned off it as 
early as possible because what they learn in guitar tablature 
doesn't transfer to other musical domains easily, so one 
remains a guitar player and does not become a musician. A 
bit over the top, but the point is valid.  Ease can be 
bought at the price of general knowledge and skill.

Addictions impose a cost on society.  Compact syntaxes do 
as well.  If one starts there, one ends up in the same 
cul de sac as VRML was prior to X3D if that syntax is 
used in an instance.  Some VRMLers who have done quite 
a bit of VRML despise XML and aren't shy about saying it 
to the point of dissing X3D at every opportunity.

Syntax is not trivial.


From: Mike Fitzgerald [mailto:mikefz@wyeast.net]

In my experience, once you're familiar with RELAX NG, the compact syntax
becomes natural 
-- to the point that you don't want to live without it. In fact, I suspect
that any RNG 
aficionados would much prefer RNC and can't go back to the XML syntax for
one reason: It's 
much quicker to develop schemas by hand, once you have RNG in you back
pocket. And 
twice-blessed by Trang, which can translate RNC to DTD, RNG, or XML Schema,
you don't get 
yourself painted in a corner. Except there is one problem: At a given point
you are 
addicted. Strangely, though, all the RNC detox centers are empty. %^}


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS