xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] XUL Compact Syntax Study Now Online

RE: [xml-dev] XUL Compact Syntax Study Now Online - Is XML too hard for

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: 'Norman Gray' <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk>, Mike Fitzgerald <mikefz@wyeast.net>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] XUL Compact Syntax Study Now Online - Is XML too hard for Aunt Trudie?
From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 08:20:20 -0500
Cc: 'xml-dev' <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>

First it is 'just for the human'; then it is, 
'why can't we make the wire more efficient', 
then, 'humans don't read this anyway because 
we have tools for that'.

It's just more stuff.

len


From: Norman Gray [mailto:norman@astro.gla.ac.uk]

Separating processors from syntax is why SAX is a Good Thing.

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH]: A couple fixes to org/xml/sax/package.html
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] XUL Compact Syntax Study Now Online - Is XML too hardfor Aunt Trudie?
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] XUL Compact Syntax Study Now Online - Is XML too hard for Aunt Trudie?
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] XUL Compact Syntax Study Now Online - Is XML too hard for Aunt Trudie?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread