[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Michael Champion wrote:
>
> On May 3, 2004, at 10:33 AM, Chiusano Joseph wrote:
>
> > Below I referenced Chris Ferris' presentation - here's a link that
> > contains a PDF of it:
> >
> > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200404/msg00098.html
> >
>
> Thanks Joe!
>
> Can someone explain to me why these weren't just considered two inputs
> to an OASIS TC that would choose between them, or refactor them both
> into something better than either?
Follow this thread, from July 2003 - it's the WSRM TC's response to the
announcement of the WS-ReliableMessaging Spec Workshop:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrm/200307/msg00008.html
Kind Regards,
Joe Chiusano
Member, OASIS WSRM TC (but letting the e-mail archives speak for
themselves)
Booz | Allen | Hamilton
Strategy and Technology Consultants to the World
> I don't understand this New World
> Order where specs are supposed to be completed before they go to a
> standards body and the market is supposed to choose among the competing
> inputs. That's taking (not DesignByCommittee) a bit far, it would
> seem.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
--
Kind Regards,
Joseph Chiusano
Associate
Booz | Allen | Hamilton
|
