xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)

Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Burak Emir <Burak.Emir@epfl.ch>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)
From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 12:58:21 -0400
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org, mailto:jsr-225-comments@jcp.org
In-reply-to: <40B5FFEB.9000202@epfl.ch>
References: <40B4E24A.4080801@datadirect.com> <40B5FFEB.9000202@epfl.ch>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4

Burak Emir wrote:

> I just cannot believe that one can seriously want to repeat the IMHO 
> biggest design error of JDBC, namely to pass *strings* to the library.
> 
> This effectively kills all possibilities of static (compile-time) 
> verification of queries, like syntax checking (let alone types).
> 
> flabbergasted...

Hi Burak,

I forwarded your comment to the JSR 225 comments list 
(jsr-225-comments@jcp.org).

Jonathan

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)
  - From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>

References:
- Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)
  - From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)
  - From: Burak Emir <Burak.Emir@epfl.ch>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Logical models, hierarchy, network model
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Early Draft Review: XQuery for Java (JSR 225)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread