[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: "Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
- From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 13:00:11 -0700
- Thread-index: AcRJokiSVe22ky3dTvKuKfH8p21BFgAAtLuQ
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elliotte Rusty Harold [mailto:elharo@metalab.unc.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 11:47 AM
> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration
> n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
>
> Beyond the issue of lying metadata, there's a much more
> important distinction between metadata based search engines
> like the semantic web and data based engines like Google.
> Providing metadata requires extra effort which is roughly
> proportional to the quality and amount of the metadata to be
> provided. There is a noticeable cost for a site to add
> metadata.
I used to agree with this and loved to quote Cory Doctorow's Metacrap
article but the rise of RSS has changed my mind. There is now quite a
lot of metadata out there, created for free from tools that completely
integrated content creation with metadata creation.
--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM
If two wrongs don't make a right, try three.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
|
