OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] Semantic We

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

On Sunday 06 June 2004 22:23, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
> At 8:33 PM +0100 6/6/04, Dave Pawson wrote:
> >>Absolutely not. The fact is computers aren't that smart, and robust
> >>systems allow and prepare for human intervention. In practice, most
> >>debugged and deployed systems rarely require human intervention of
> >>this sort.
> >
> >I've not met many such perfect systems.
> The systems don't need to be perfect.That's why I wrote "rarely"
> instead of "never". Pretty much all systems do require intervention
> of this sort, but rarely. The vast majority of transactions go
> through without a hitch. It's only the rare one that needs manual
> assistance.

What kind of system are you talking about? And where? 'cause I haven't seen 
many of the kind you're talking about either. In most systems I've seen in 
production, if you ignore the schema whenever you feel like it (provided that 
you can do it in the authoring environment, that is), you're going to mess up 
something, and a manual fix will be required.

IMHO, XML's biggest mistake was to make validation optional.




News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS