xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev]

Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev]

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev]InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 10:23:00 +0100
In-reply-to: <0E36FD96D96FCA4AA8E8F2D199320E52020A3BCC@RED-MSG-43.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <0E36FD96D96FCA4AA8E8F2D199320E52020A3BCC@RED-MSG-43.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

Joshua Allen wrote:

> You're missing the point.  With Google, you only get indexed the
> metadata that they permit you to index.  Period.  It's the opposite of
> open.  

There's nothing notable about Google in this respect, other than it 
being popular.

I'm surprised no-one's mentioned DMOZ yet.

cheers
Bill
-- 
Propylon
http://www.propylon.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
  - From: ari@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (K. Ari Krupnikov)

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
  - From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] The triples datamodel -- was Re: [xml-dev] SemanticWeb permathread, iteration n+1
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Difference between RPC and Doc. type in WSDL(need help)
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Semantic Web permathread, iteration n+1 (was Re: [xml-dev] InfoWorld agrees with Elliote Rusty Harold)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread