[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 10:26:14PM +0100, Paul Sumner Downey wrote:
> Len wrote:
> > FutureProof: At the end of the automation era, the only
> > people left with jobs were technical writers. Writing
> > universally acceptable sentences proved to be the one
> > truly intractable problem.
>
> Maybe the W3C should eat its own dog food and write up
> their specs in OWL. Believe it or not i'm being serious!
So are they!
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns
http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl
I don't know if those documents capture everything they could or not,
but at least some relationships between the specs are declared. For
example, in the OWL document, there's this;
<rdfs:Class rdf:ID="Class">
<rdfs:label>Class</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="&rdfs;Class"/>
</rdfs:Class>
Mark.
--
Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Seeking work on large scale application/data integration projects
and/or the enabling infrastructure for same.
|
