[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@intergraph.com>,"XML Developers List" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Subject: RE: [xml-dev] How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet)
- From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:27:32 -0700
- Cc: <danny666@virgilio.it>
- Thread-index: AcRZXEJvGeD9hYOjRvypw3vpS8hoaAADZa2Q
- Thread-topic: [xml-dev] How It All Goes Wrong (WAS RE: [xml-dev] Triplets on the Internet)
> 1. The general arguments that 'free enterprise
> are free of responsibility' are made for many companies
Agreed; I was glossing over this point and reacting to the tangential
issue of pot calling kettle black. I think this applies as well to
publications like "perrspectives". I would like to see all such venues
publish completely open lists of pointers to conflicting/contrasting
viewpoints, as a matter of responsible advocacy. In fact, I think
Google is a great boon to people who want to hear "the other side" of
any story, and annotation services could also be very useful.
> 2. The example of Google was provided to show just
> how quickly biases propagate. Their effects are
OK, I see that point now. This is the whole "Google as
amplifier/echo-chamber" syndrome. I once again note that Eric Bina has
virtually been erased from the history of web browsers.
|