[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
bry@itnisk.com wrote:
>
> Hi, quick survey of responses here, does it seem reasonable that in a government
> publication(not U.S government) describing various standards as either ones that
> should be abandoned, that are recommended, and that are accepted, that RPC
> should be abandoned
Could you please elaborate on your specific usage of "RPC" here? Do you
mean SOAP-based RPC mechanisms, distributed object computing
(CORBA/DCOM/RMI), etc.
and that SOAP-based Webservices are accepted - using SOAP
> 1.1, and WSDL 1.1?
>
> Note that HTTP 1.1 is also accepted,
Do you mean SOAP over HTTP? HTML and HTTP? etc.
and data integration with xml is
> recomended, so I suppose REST is slightly higher than SOAP.
What would "higher" mean here? You are referring to a stack?
Kind Regards,
Joe Chiusano
Booz | Allen | Hamilton
> Although not if I
> ask anyone around here.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
begin:vcard
n:Chiusano;Joseph
tel;work:(703) 902-6923
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.bah.com
org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team
adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012;
version:2.1
email;internet:chiusano_joseph@bah.com
title:Senior Consultant
fn:Joseph M. Chiusano
end:vcard
|
