Lists Home |
Date Index |
Bill de hÓra wrote:
> Michael Champion wrote:
>> [...] What's going on? Or what am I missing?
... which links to
which is very interesting. In some ways, this is the exact opposite of the
browser wars of the 1990's -- for example, although the document comes from
Microsoft's competitors, the first design principle *requires* MSIE 6
I don't agree with every single word in the position paper, but it is
refreshingly pragmatic, recommending that we build on what we already have
everything up and start over again. I find myself liking an awful lot of
the paper, such as this statement:
If a specification is so large that it requires profiling and/or cannot be
implemented on small devices, then it is a failing of the specification
that should be solved by editing the complete spec, possibly simplifying
or obsoleting some parts.
I also chuckled at this question and answer:
What is needed from schema languages?
Thanks to Bill for the link.
All the best,