xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] WS-Addressing to W3C: Is the Tide Turning?

Re: [xml-dev] WS-Addressing to W3C: Is the Tide Turning?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@propylon.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] WS-Addressing to W3C: Is the Tide Turning?
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 18:22:24 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: XML Developers List <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
In-reply-to: <411BD162.4050805@propylon.com>

I'm just curious why W3C and not OASIS?
If WS-Addressing is so fundamental to the rest of the WS-xxx stack,
it makes more sense to go to the place that works faster.
	/r$

--
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview      http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] WS-Addressing to W3C: Is the Tide Turning?
  - From: Michael Champion <mc@xegesis.org>

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] WS-Addressing to W3C: Is the Tide Turning?
  - From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@propylon.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] WS-Addressing to W3C: Is the Tide Turning?
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] WS-Addressing to W3C: Is the Tide Turning?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] WS-Addressing to W3C: Is the Tide Turning?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] WS-Addressing to W3C: Is the Tide Turning?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread