xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"

RE: [xml-dev] Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@intergraph.com>,"Eric van der Vlist" <vdv@dyomedea.com>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@STJUDE.ORG>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:45:29 -0500
Thread-index: AcSlZ+ZV94LoyAWZROaDH0xyXxhNvgAACYkg
Thread-topic: [xml-dev] Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"

Bullard, Claude L (Len) <len.bullard@intergraph.com> writes:
> 
> XML is also an archive format.   That might raise an eyebrow.

I suppose so, personally, I don't expect archives to give me much in the
way of dynamic capabilities or currency. Having said that, I am not a
big believer in using XML as an archive format except for audit
purposes.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [xml-dev] Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
  - From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
- RE: [xml-dev] Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
  - From: Dave Pawson <davep@dpawson.co.uk>

Prev by Date: xsl question
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
Next by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread