xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"

RE: [xml-dev] Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "'Hunsberger, Peter'" <Peter.Hunsberger@STJUDE.ORG>,"'Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)'" <len.bullard@intergraph.com>,"'Eric van der Vlist'" <vdv@dyomedea.com>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:37:53 +0100
In-reply-to: <1E0CC447E59C974CA5C7160D2A2854EC02FECEDF@SJMEMXMB04.stjude.sjcrh.local>
Thread-index: AcSlZ+ZV94LoyAWZROaDH0xyXxhNvgAACYkgAARQkQA=

> I suppose so, personally, I don't expect archives to give me 
> much in the
> way of dynamic capabilities or currency. Having said that, I am not a
> big believer in using XML as an archive format except for audit
> purposes.
> 

It's being used extensively by professionals in the field of digital
archiving: what would you advise them to use instead?

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
  - From: James Landrum <james.landrum@ndsu.nodak.edu>
- Re: [xml-dev] Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
  - From: Micah Dubinko <micah@dubinko.info>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
  - From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@STJUDE.ORG>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Ted Nelson's "XML is Evil"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread