xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?

Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: Oleg Tkachenko <oleg@tkachenko.com>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:10:27 +0200
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
In-reply-to: <4178BC37.2020007@tkachenko.com>
References: <FEF4858E8AB32D4EAC2CF2A7D85386EB0B25429A@lnxdayexch06b.lexis-nexis.com> <20041021193255.GE32505@w3.org> <4197459d.583804135@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <4178BC37.2020007@tkachenko.com>

* Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
>>>I'd love to see a more sophisticated XSL-FO being used in browsers.
>> 
>> The XSL-FOnt-tag language is not very popular among web authors...
>
>Sure, provided none of web browsers support XSL-FO (except for x-smiles 
>browser may be).

Well, http://people.opera.com/howcome/1999/foch.html that does not come
by surprise, does it?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
  - From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
  - From: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@lexisnexis.com>
- Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
  - From: Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
  - From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
  - From: Oleg Tkachenko <oleg@tkachenko.com>

Prev by Date: [ANN] xframe - xsddoc-0.6-beta released
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] After XQuery, are we done?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS